SNAP MUST BE TRUMP's FAULT!!!

I am given to understand that, during Trump's first term, he actually used the allocated emergency funds during a government shutdown, considering it an unforeseen emergency. But using them left some funds available for other emergencies that time.

During the Biden administration, SNAP enrollment skyrocketed. The reasons for that can be set aside for the moment, but the emergency allocation did not match the enrollment. Enrollment significantly outstripped the allocations.

The numbers I hear are USD 4.7 billion in the funds, and just a month's worth of SNAP is going to be more than USD 8 billion.

Remember that Democrats started off October block-voting against a simple budget continuation bill that would have allowed SNAP and basically all the government to continue to function while Congress continued haggling over the details. The required threshold for the continuing resolution was 60 YES. Or 61, I'm not clear which.

All but 1 Republican Senators voted YES. All but 1 Democrat Senators voted NO.

YES got the majority, but, at 55 to 45, it was not enough to pass it.

This has been the result a total of 14 times over October. 14 times, the Democrats voted against continuing things essentially as they had been at the beginning of October. I'll let you ask them why.

This is not an unforeseen or unplanned emergency, and that was the question Trump was waiting on.

I am given to understand that Trump has, in fact, authorized using what funds there are as a stop-gap, but it's only enough to last a couple of weeks. And there is nothing to replace it. We're going to be facing the same question again, with no emergency funds, in two weeks.

And the continuing resolution has expired, so it's back to the House.

Are Capitalists Thieves?

Mamdani is apparently saying

Taxation isn't theft, capitalism is!!

Well, he's got a sort of point. Too many capitalists are not paying their workers what they are worth.

Setting aside the concept of paying workers more than they are worth, which is a management concept that bears exploration -- 

When a business owner refuses to pay his employers what they are worth, we can say he gets what he pays for.

Or we can say he doesn't get what he doesn't pay for.

Or we can say he often doesn't (even) get what he pays for.

But we have trouble saying he gets what he doesn't pay for.

If he does get what he doesn't pay for, it's only temporary, and he eventually pays the price for it. How far down the road it is before he pays the price determines how many others have to pay, too.

The trouble with applying that analysis to Mamdani's claim that capitalists are thieves is that we know some capitalists are thieves. Not all, but we do know there are some stupid capitalists who seem to enjoy polluting the very marketplace where they make their money.

But we also know all socialists are thieves.

Shutting Down the Government for Votes

For those who are confused by the Democrats complaining that it must be the Republicans shutting down the government since it's the Republicans that have the majority --

 

Budget bills require 60% of the votes in the Senate.

 

The Republicans do have a simple majority, but they don't have 61.

 

14 times, the Republicans have all but 1 voted to continue the budget as it was before October, so that Congress can debate ideologies without hurting you or me. One or two Democrats have also voted YES on the continuing resolution.

 

14 times, almost all the Democrats (plus 1 Republican) have voted against paying the government, the military, SNAP, and all the rest. 

 

55 votes is a simple majority, but it isn't enough to pass the budget bill. 

 

And in between votes, the Democrats have racked up one of the longest filibusters in the history of the US. While you and I are wondering how more than a third of Americans are going to eat in November, much less pay their bills, they are reading poetry in the Senate to prevent debate or discussion.

 

Why?

 

Because the continuing resolution does not roll the budget back to July or before, back before the government started getting halfway serious about trimming waste in the budget.

 

So it is the Democrats refusing to approve a simple continuing resolution which is shutting down the government.

 

And they are blaming the Republicans.

 

And they are keeping the government shut down until the elections this week.

 

It looks to me like blackmail.

Bernice King's Advice, Interpreted

There is a list of wise advice for dealing with Trump and his administration being passed around and attributed to Bernice King, one of the daughters of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Coretta Scott King. 

It seems like useful advice, if you interpret it to all sides of the current political differences.

Here is my interpretation:

---

(1) Quit talking about people. Talk about principles.

(2) Remember that conspiracies happen. Then they self-destruct. They are not on your side, whatever your side is.

(3) Arguing does not convince people to join your side. All it does is give the conspiracies power. Seek understanding instead.

(4) Focus on principles first. Personality is a decoy. Policy is for people who can implement policy, and if individual people don't implement policy it doesn't get implemented. Implement your policies and don't wait for the government.

(5) Keep your messages positive. Anger, fear, and darkness give the conspiracies power.

(6) You are not helpless. If you are hopeless, find something worth hoping for.

(7) The arts, artisanry, micro-industry, philosophy, education, and even religion are among the essential small-scale activities that ideologues and conspirators want to throw under the bus. Support those who do the small-scale essentials. Participate, because that's the best support. Shun ideologies that erase the individual search for meaning.

(8) News is news, and is often not news. Check your sources, and don't panic.

(9) Take care of yourself. Listen to your own deepest heart, your own deepest conscience. If you believe in a real God, that's where only the real God can talk to you.

(10) Resist evil, wherever it comes from. Peaceful resistance almost always works better than violent resistance, and violence always puts you at a disadvantage. Start as peaceful as you can, and keep it as peaceful as you can.

 

---

 

[Facebook turned the bullet for number (8) into a shocked smiley, and I wanted to leave it like that because we should always be ready to be shocked at how brazenly fake our news sources can be. But it registers as a graphic and would become the lead graphic for this post, so I took it out. (8-|) ]

Checking the provenance, here's a URL to her post update, back in early 2017, on FB:   https://www.facebook.com/OfficialBerniceKing/posts/10158320528270571

The account looks legitimate and I found it via an old Twitter (now X) post that appears to be hers, so I'm pretty sure it is legitimately hers. Her mode of expression indicates she may not want it to be considered original with her, but I would express my gratitude to her for posting it. 

Thank you, Ms. King.

 

Neuro-Typical? Normal?

We should understand that no one is neuro-typical. Neuro-typical is a statistical artifact. 

So is normalcy.

Claiming that, because you are "normal", everyone must conform exactly to your ideas of how things should be, of how people communicate, of how people behave, is a symptom of a gross divergence. 

No mortal should claim to be God, at any rate.

It should be enough to have people around you who will meet you half-way. The vast majority of people in the world don't even have that, and we've still managed to more than survive. 

It's true that, in times of peace, somehow we all get along. 

But it's because of all the people that are struggling and somehow sort-of meeting the demands of those who most loudly proclaim that they themselves should be the norm, their behavior and language should be the standard.

Each generation has to learn it all over again -- how to meet people half-way. 

Let people be.

 

Dual Citizenship?

Citizenship is a problem I've been wrestling with for a while, now everyone is talking about it.

Dual citizenship is a can of worms. It entangles people in the laws of two countries with necessarily incompatible legal foundations.

The USA recognizes, or rather, refrains from refusing to recognize, dual citizenship.

Japan does not recognize dual citizenship, technically.

If I were to try to obtain Japanese citizenship, by technical requirement of Japanese law, I would have to formally give up my US citizenship (which is an expensive process). And the USA would not necessarily recognize my having done so.

But I have lived more than half my life in Japan at this point, and I have no reason not to expect to die here.

When trying to work through dilemmas, I like to work out ideals and then map them to reality. Or try to.

Ideally, we should not need dual-citizenship. What we call permanent residence should count as citizenship. That we could tell whose laws we have a greater obligation to.

But that ideal requires things to be different from the way they are in this world.

In specific, there would be birth citizenship. There are fine points to untangle in that, but we can't untangle them until we deal with some other problems, so we won't try just yet.

Then, if you had lived long enough to become what we call a permanent resident in our current laws, we should be, rather, citizens, so that we could participate properly in voting and taxation and other duties which devolve on people who live in primarily in one place.

The birth citizenship would not be erased, it would be placed in abeyance, and would be recoverable.

People who spend half their time in one country and half in another would claim one country of citizenship and would be a, perhaps long-term, resident of the other. 

Taxes would be split up by where they are incurred.

Social security as a national retirement insurance scheme would have to be privatized, so that the person who moves could take it with him /her.

Now that would require cooperation between the countries involved, but I think it would provide a better framework for preventing countries' laws from becoming entangled with each other. 

And that's all the time I have for theorizing I have right now.