- one to reduce the influence of the party duopoly on the presidential election,
- one to make it clear that a noble class by any other name is still a noble class (and banned),
- and one to clarify and strengthen the original intent of securing the rights of authors and inventors to their work.
Surely, playing with the text of the Constitution is not wise?
Surely, it would be more appropriate to deal with the current problems with the law with ordinary legislation, having Congress clean up its own mess?
If only Congress would clean up the mess they call the US (national/federal) code.
But we have a deeper problem. Several of the amendments and a long string of reinterpretations that we once thought were expedient are denaturing the Constitutional balance of power.
For far too long time, we have ignored the fourth branch. We have forgotten that a people who will not govern themselves shall not be be governed to any good purpose at all. We have let the executive, legislative, and judicial branches take the ascendant position of power.
Worse, we have allowed the political parties to try to substitute themselves as the fourth branch.
And we have allowed the media to try to substitute themselves as the fourth branch.
And we have allowed corporations to try to substitute themselves as the fourth
Who else is trying to jump into the presumed vacuum left when the Constitution banned the nobility and laid the foundation of sovereignty on the people instead?
Religious groups are not the only dangerous partisans whose influence in government must be strongly counteracted.
If we can restore the Constitutional protections and balances of power by ordinary means, that would be wiser.
But we have to start talking about the problems before we can start fixing them. Talking about the problems is one of the ordinary means, really.
Raising the possibility of amendment is one way to try to kick the conversation out into the general forum of discussion.
Dangerous times call for pushing rhetoric a little towards the extreme.